Biodiversity and Conservation: A Hypertext Book by Peter J. Bryant

Chapter 4: EVOLUTION OF HUMANS AND THE PLEISTOCENE EXTINCTIONS

 

EVOLUTION OF HUMANS

The Pleistocene is the time when humans evolved in the old world. The first hominids (i.e. creatures more closely related to humans than to apes) lived in Africa about 7 million years ago. Scientists have now identified about 14 species, of which the best known is Australopithecus. They were 1-1.5 meters tall, walked upright, had a protruding jaw, prominent eyebrow ridges and a small braincase.

2.5 million years ago, Homo erectus appeared in Africa, with a brain as big as the smallest modern human brain. H. erectus differed from modern humans by the prominent brow ridges and receding chin. They made sophisticated stone hand-axes with sharp edges, possibly made spear points, and probably used fire. They spread over Africa and Asia and survived until about 400,000 years ago.

The first fossils that are classified in the modern species Homo sapiens date from about 200,000 years ago (Nat. Geog. , Jan. 1996) and are called neanderthals (a subspecies of Homo sapiens). The neanderthals still looked primitive, with prominent brow ridges, low foreheads, and receding chins, but their brains were, on average, slightly larger than ours. They hunted woolly rhino and cave-bear and disappeared about 30,000 years ago.

About 30,000 years ago, fully modern humans called Cro-Magnon evolved from the neanderthal-like forms of the Near East and spread into Asia and Europe, rapidly replacing the more primitive neanderthals. They had domed heads, smooth brows, and prominent chins. They made precision tools, including definite spearheads, and they produced spectacular works of wildlife art on the walls of caves, which provide some glimpses of how the big game was hunted - with spears and rocks and probably also traps and fire. One painting shows an eviscerated bison about to gore a human.

Last year scientists reported discovering remains of an entirely new species of dwarf human, Homo floresiensis. These people were about one meter tall and lived about 18,000 years ago on the island of Flores, east of Java. Not only were they hobbitt-sized, their brains were the smallest of any known hominid. Remains of dwarf elephants were found in the same deposits as the humans.

How do we know the ages of things? Radiocarbon dating

HUMANS ENTER THE NEW WORLD

During the last glacial period (the Wurm glaciation of 120-20,000 years ago), so much sea water was frozen into the ice caps that the sea level fell about 300 feet, and Asia and North America were connected by a strip of land called the "Bering Land Bridge".  However, during this time a huge glacier (the Laurentide Glacier) stretched all the way from the Arctic to the Pacific Ocean, blocking animal and human movement between the continents. At about 14,000 years ago a warming trend opened up an ice-free corridor between the main Laurentide glacier and the smaller Cordilleran ice sheet along the coast. This made it possible for early humans to migrate from Asia into North America. Then during the present interglacial, melting ice caused the sea level to rise, cutting off the land connection between Asia and North America.

North and South America were free of humans until they arrived from Asia about 11,500 years ago, soon after the ice-free corridor opened up. These Clovis people are named after the town in New Mexico where their distinctive spear points were found in 1932. Clovis points have been found in association with mammoth bones at several locations in North America, suggesting that the Clovis people hunted these animals. At some sites (e.g. Murray Springs) bones of other large mammals have been found, including Horse, Camels, Bison, Lion, and Dire wolf.

It has long been assumed that the Clovis people were the ancestors of American Indians, but this assumption is now being questioned. There are no human skeletal remains from the earliest arrivals, and only about ten sets of remains more than 9,000 years old.  Surprisingly, physical anthropologists have concluded that the skulls of two of the oldest skeletons (Spirit Cave Man from Nevada, 9,400 years old and Kennewick Man found in Washington State in 1996, 9,300 years old) are quite different from those of modern American Indians. Their cranial vaults are long and narrow rather than round, their faces are slender rather than broad, and they do not have prominent cheekbones. These skeletons resemble those of Polynesians, Europeans, and the Ainu of Japan, more than they resemble American Indians, leading to the idea that American Indians may be derived from one or more distinct groups of settlers arriving some time after the Clovis culture. The third specimen (Wizards Beach Man from Nevada, 9,200 years old), is more similar to contemporary American Indians.  

The base sequence of mitochondrial DNA (mDNA) from living American Indian populations is similar to that of samples from Asia and Siberia, confirming the earlier conclusions from archeology.  But some mutations in American Indian mDNA are found elsewhere only among the aboriginal populations in Southeast Asia and in the islands of Melanesia and Polynesia, providing a suggestion that the ancestors of American Indians may have arrived by sea.  Unfortunately, three laboratories were unable to obtain any DNA evidence from Kennewick man.

The legal requirement to return human remains to tribes that can show an affiliation, so that they can be reburied, has led to enormous controversy over how much scientific analysis of these samples will be possible.  In the case of Kennewick man, after the failure to obtain DNA evidence the Department of the Interior in 2000 decided to abandon scientific research and give the skeleton to five Indian tribes who jointly claimed the remains for reburial.  But then a judge in 2002 ruled in favor of a group of scientists who sued to obtain the remains for scientific study, since there was no proof for a "cultural relationship" between the skeleton and present-day American Indians.

Some evidence suggests human occupation of both North and South America earlier than the Clovis culture, leading to several fascinating alternative possibilities. Several sites in the southeastern part of the U.S. have been dated much earlier than Clovis, but the evidence from most of these sites has been seriously questioned for technical reasons. However, one remarkably informative early settlement in Monte Verde, Chile, makes it difficult to completely accept the traditional "Clovis-first" view. The site includes remains of dwellings and stone tools (not Clovis points) as well as medicinal plants, and dates from 12,500 years ago. This early date has led to suggestions that early migrants may have reached and explored North and South America by boat, rather than on foot. This would have allowed them to avoid the glacial barrier, it would have been faster, and it might have been easier, since food would have been plentiful. Archeological evidence shows that Pacific people used boats as early as 25,000 or even 40,000 years ago, so the technology may have been available. There were many unglaciated pieces of coastline that would have allowed breaks in the sea journey, and there are several sites along the coast of Canada, California, Peru, Ecuador, and Chile that show evidence for human occupation between 10,000 and 12,000 years ago. Unfortunately the sea level is much higher now than then, so much of the archeological evidence for seafaring at that time may now be deeply submerged and difficult to find.

LATE PLEISTOCENE EXTINCTIONS

In late Pleistocene, during the last 50,000 years, there were mass extinction events in many different parts of the world, involving at least 200 genera (plural of genus = a group of related species). But this was different from previous episodes of mass extinction:

1. It was much more selective, involving mainly the megafauna: the large herbivores (mammoths, mastodons, huge ground sloths, cave bears, woolly rhinoceros, other rhinoceroses, etc.) and the carnivores that fed on them, the dire wolves and saber-tooth cats. There was no accelerated extinction of smaller terrestrial species, plants, or marine organisms.

The following disappeared from America, Europe and Australia:

All herbivores

> 1000 kg

75% of herbivores

100-1000 kg

41% of herbivores

5-100 kg

< 2% of herbivores

< 5kg

2. It occurred at different times on different land masses:

Time of start of
major extinction episodes
(years before present)

Africa and S.E. Asia

50,000

Australia

50,000

North Eurasia

13,000

North America

11,000

South America

10,000

West Indies

4,000

New Zealand

900

Madagascar

800

This excludes any global catastrophe or climatic change as an explanation.

In all of these cases except Africa, the extinctions occurred shortly after the first arrival of prehistoric humans.  The first humans were faced with animals that had evolved in the absence of human predators, and the animals were probably easily overcome. Therefore, the most plausible explanation is that these extinctions were caused by overexploitation by human hunters.

In Africa, massive extinction does not coincide with the arrival of humans. Humans had been evolving there for millions of years without causing mass extinctions (they may not have been as carnivorous as their descendants in other parts of the world) but it does coincide with the maximum development of advanced early Stone Age hunting cultures.

Many authors have remarked that to see what the Pleistocene was like, you should go to Africa. Africa still has more large herbivores (including elephants, hippos, rhinos, etc.) than any other place on earth. But, even in Africa, the big game we see today is only about 70% of the genera that were present in mid-Pleistocene. About 50 genera disappeared about 40,000 years ago.

It is paradoxical that the region where humans have existed the longest (Africa) retained a wide variety of big game whereas the areas where humans arrived more recently have suffered a more complete loss.  Perhaps the African big game had time to evolve defensive behavior, whereas species elsewhere were caught defenseless and naive by a newly arrived advanced hunting culture.

Australia once boasted a spectacular megafauna including giant wombats as big as grizzly bears and giant kangaroos.  But the continent was colonized by humans (already Homo sapiens) around 55,000 years ago and subsequently lost all of its large and medium-sized mammals; in fact all except some kangaroos.  All 19 species exceeding 100 kg and 22 of 38 species 10-100 kg disappeared, along with three large reptiles and the 450lb flightless bird GenyornisMiller et al. used eggshell dating to show that Genyornis disappeared suddenly around 50,000 years ago, very shortly after the first arrival of humans.  This does not necessarily mean that the animals were simply hunted to extinction.  The humans brought to the continent the use of fire as a hunting tool, and this may have destroyed so much vegetation that many herbivores were deprived of their food and could not survive.  Although some authors have claimed that the Australian megafauna was wiped out quickly after the arrival of humans, careful analysis of the ages of various remains suggests that man may have coexisted with the Australian megafauna for over 10,000 years. More discussion.

North America. 12,000 years ago, North America had an amazing Megafauna including condors with a sixteen-foot wingspan, ground sloths as big as hippos, three kinds of elephants, three kinds of cheetah and five other kinds of big cat, several kinds of pronghorn antelopes, long-legged, antelope-like pigs, an assortment of camel, llama, deer, horse, and bison species, giant wolves, giant bears and giant armadillos.  North America has been called a "super-Serengeti" with more big animal species than you would find in Africa. But 11,000 years ago, nearly all of these big animals - 70 species or 95% of the megafauna - disappeared completely. This is exactly the time when humans (Paleo-Indians) colonized North America, and their arrival and skill as hunters at that time is documented by the appearance of artifacts. The disappearing mammals in North America included all of the following:

*Mammoths

*Mastodons

*Horses

*Tapirs

*Camels

*Four-horned antelopes

Ground sloths

Peccaries

Giant beaver

Dire wolves

Giant jaguar

Saber-tooth cat

*Some of these fossils are directly associated with human artifacts in archaeological sites.

The carnivores on the list were probably not hunted directly, but were dependent on the large herbivores for food, so soon followed them to extinction. In some cases accurate dating methods have shown that certain species became extinct at exactly the times that humans arrived. Giant ground sloths and mountain goats in the Grand Canyon both went extinct 11,100 years ago, which is the time that the human hunters arrived (within the accuracy of dating methods, which is +200 years). There is also direct evidence for killing by humans. The human archeological sites from 11,000 years ago have stone projectile points, which were presumably used in hunting the large mammals. One mammoth skeleton has eight stone spear points among its ribs. Some of the large mammals were trapped in pits, and some were cornered using fire. La Brea tar pits and the Page Museum is an excellent place to see the fossils and reconstructions from this period. Mammoth Trumpet (a newsletter about the first Americans).

Detailed study of late Pleistocene extinctions in North America (Martin, 1986) suggests that they happened over just a few hundred years. This explains why there is so little archaeological evidence for hunting of mammoths in the New World. The total number of mammoths from archeological sites in North America is 38; in Asia, where mammoths were hunted for many thousands of years, there are many more mammoth remains -e.g. remains of 1000 mammoths at just one site in Czechoslovakia and of 100,000 horses at another site. Paul Martin has suggested that the human population quickly expanded south from the Bering land bridge, and exterminated the big game as they went ("Blitzkrieg" model). Martin, P. S.1986. Refuting late Pleistocene extinction models. In Elliot, D.K. (ed) Dynamic extinction. Wiley and Sons, NY. 1073-130.

Other authors have disputed the idea that human hunting finished off the Pleistocene megafauna of North America. For example, Donald Grayson, an archaeologist at the University of Washington, suggests that climate shifts and associated vegetation changes could have been responsible. Grayson disputes two aspects of the overkill hypothesis:

1. Out of the 35 genera that became extinct around this time, only 15 have been shown to have survived beyond 12,000 years ago. So 20 genera may have disappeared before human arrival.

2. There is good evidence for mammoth kills by the Clovis people, but no evidence that they hunted any other large mammals (he does not mention the evidence that they hunted two kinds of buffalo).

Paul Martin responds that the Pleistocene megafauna had survived several climatic changes during the previous million years, some more severe than the one that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene. Yet these changes did not cause multiple extinctions.

South America was also colonized by humans about eleven thousand years ago, and since that time it has lost 80% of its genera of large mammals, including ground sloths, horses, and mastodons.

SURVIVORS FROM THE PLEISTOCENE

In North America, the only surviving herbivores of the megafauna are bears, elk, moose, buffalo and mountain lion. The horse also survived, but only through its domestication and preservation overseas. The moose was hunted to near extinction but has recovered to a population of about 1 million. Yellowstone moose decline due to hunger, not predators, ENN Daily News -- 10-6-1999

 

Back to:

Forward to:

Top of Chapter
Hypertext Book Table of Contents

Chapter 5: EXTINCTION AND DEPLETION FROM OVER-EXPLOITATION

Copyright ©2006  Peter J. Bryant (pjbryant@uci.edu), School of Biological Sciences,
University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Phone (949) 824-4714 Fax (949) 824-3571
A Project of the Interdisciplinary Minor in Global Sustainability