Interdisciplinary Minor in Global Sustainability
Senior Seminar
University of California, Irvine
June 1997
Bringing back the bison, bringing back an entire way of life
Issue Guide for the Minor in Global Sustainability Biological Conservation, Bio. 65, University of California Irvine
prepared by: Mari Ohara
Great Plains history
The Great Plains offer a familiar story of overexploitation
and the emergence of the need to fix the damage. Today rural areas are
showing the decline of traditional agriculture and extractive land uses
that have left the area barren and unproductive. Restoration projects,
in particular those involving the reintroduction of the bison, give an
example of bringing the native ecosystem of an area back to life.
Grasslands once covered 40% of our nation, the bison once
ranged over 48 of our states. Pre-settlement bison population estimates
range from 30 to 70 million, after the extensive overexploitation of these
animals their numbers dwindled to less than two dozen (Walters, 1996).
The grasslands were a highly productive ecosystem even when the bison numbered
in the millions because the two coevolved with each other adapting to conditions
as well as each other. Today's cattle from the old world have replaced
the bison's place in the plains degrading them while collecting the majority
of the grains produced by American agriculture. Given the natural intact
environment, bison thrive on their own without outside help. They are adapted
to the harsh plains, "burned into the genes of bison is the speed
and agility needed to outrun a prairie fire or track the greenup path of
a summer thunderstorm. This is an animal shaped by millennia of natural
selective pressures in the Great Plains environment," Fox and biologist
Craig Knowles wrote (Defenders).
The Great Plains have suffered cycles of booms and busts
since its early white settlement. The first began in 1862 with the Homestead
Act. The Act gave pioneer families 160 acres of free federal land to be
farmed for five years. This was the start of federally subsidized settlement
that caused soil erosion and the lowering of the water table eventually
leading to heavy depopulation. The next cycle began in the early 1900s
with new homestead laws and larger free land incentives. This second cycle
ended with the Great Depression, drought, the Dust Bowl, the abolition
of homesteading, and was illustrated to us in John Steinbeck's Grapes
of Wrath. The third cycle beginning in the 1940s reached its peak in
the 1970s when the Department of Agriculture encouraged fence-post to fence-post
cultivation. By the mid 1980s the bust phase set in and is still continuing
(Popper, 1994).
The Buffalo Commons
The Buffalo Commons is a phrase that was coined by Deborah
E. Popper and Frank J. Popper in 1987. It is essentially "an appeal
for rethinking Plains possibilities" says Popper. Over the years the
Buffalo Commons idea has evolved becoming a description of the long-range,
open-ended series of landuse changes that are occurring on the plains (Popper,
1994). Central to the changes is the reintroduction of the bison and
the replanting of shortgrass.
There have already been many examples of the Buffalo Commons
land uses in practice. In 1990 the InterTribal Bison Cooperative was formed
to foster bison reintroduction as an alternative to raising cattle on tribal
lands (Defenders). The Cooperative has grown to 37 member tribes
collectively owning 7,000 bison. Dubray, a Sioux and president of the InterTribal
Bison Cooperative regards his reservation's herd of 500 as a key to restoring
his people's culture, health, and pride (Nikiforuk, 1993).
Another successful illustration of the Buffalo Commons
can be seen in Ted Turner's five ranches collectively home to some 7,500
bison. The first and largest of these is the Flying D in Montana with a
herd of 3,500 free-running bison. His permanent conservation plan bars
subdivision on the Flying D and limits agricultural grazing so that enough
forage is left for wildlife.
Alternatives to buffalo
With many examples of successful Buffalo Commons areas, these days there are not many who are adamantly opposed to the idea. Since the notion of restoring the bison to the plains began, the biggest opposition has come from cattle ranchers who stand by cattle raising and do not want to see the bison return. These objections also hold in the Indian community among those tribal members who run cows (Defenders). But, with the continuing decline of the plains, and as more people move out of the area, the return of the bison has become much more accepted.
There are other alternative land uses that some great
plains communities are introducing. Forerunners are casinos and landfills
for the eastern and western states which offer quick economic development
for many of these dying counties. Casinos could employ almost everyone
in many of the small counties, attract people, and bring in tourists greatly
lifting the economy. Landfill sites are becoming more and more in demand
as the populations boom in states such as California and New York; they
could possibly bring in more money and provide more jobs than the casinos.
These are two industries that could boast at least the economies of these
great plains areas.
Bison and the plains
There are many advantages to raising bison over cattle.
Bison have a tremendous evolutionary advantage of being adapted to the
harsh plains environment. On average it costs about half as much to raise
a bison instead of a cow while bison meat can bring in almost twice the
money. Bison can sustain themselves on an intact ecosystem without grain
or medicinal supplements.
In the reintroduction of bison to areas of the Great Plains
there also lies the restoration of an entire ecosystem. These animals need
the whole ecosystem to be successful and also form a keystone species within
it. Bringing back the bison entails the restoration of all the plains animals
and plants which means a sustainable ecosystem. "The Buffalo Commons
attempts to develop stable deep-rural plains land uses that respect the
region's genius turning space, sky and the past into resources" (Popper,
April 1994).
Resources:
The Buffalo Commons and its National Restoration Implications.
http://nabalu.flas.ufl.edu/ser/Rutgers/Buffalo.html
Manning, Richard. The Buffalo is Coming Back. Defenders On Line.
http://www.defenders.org/magf-196.html
Nikiforuk, Andrew. 1993. Where the Buffalo Roam. Harrowsmith
Country Life, July/August 1993.
Popper, Deborah E. and Popper, Frank J. 1994. The Buffalo
Commons: A Bioregional Vision of the Great Plains. Landscape
Architecture, 1994, Apr, v84 n4: 144.
Popper, Deborah E. and Popper, Frank J. 1994. Great Plains: Checkered
Past, Hopeful Future. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy,
Winter 1994.
Walters, Mark Jerome. 1996. Can Bison Claim the Range? Animals,
May-June 1996.
Back to Senior Seminar