The Navy's Low Frequency Active Sonar Web Page is accessible
here.
In response to the initial outcry of environmentalist concerns, the Navy
has agreed to prepare an environmental impact statement in order to
inform environmentalists and the public of any danger which their
project would pose to marine species.
As is always the case with politics, this statement is no simple matter.
The amount of research which had already been done on the effects of
low frequency sound on marine life was actually quite limited. As such,
the Navy took upon itself the task of conducting research on the
topic itself.
It is worthwhile here to question the Navy's motives. The low
frequency active sonar system has apparently been in development
since the early or mid 1980's, and during most of that development
little attention was paid to environmentalists' concerns. With
environmental testing finally going on now, the Navy is under
a great deal of pressure to produce results which reflect
favorably on the system on which it has already spent a great
deal of taxpayers' money. It is therefore perhaps difficult to
believe that their research has been completely objective.
Additionally, environmentalists have voiced concerns that the
research the Navy was to conduct was itself being designed in
an unsafe manner and would very likely cause
disturbances to marine populations itself -- without actual
deployment of the low frequency active sonar system.
Despite these outcries, the Navy went through a great deal of
bureaucracy and eventually obtained
permission to conduct their tests.
These tests were formulated and were conducted by the Navy in conjunction with a number of civilian
scientists with backgrounds in marine biology and in the physics of sound. They were designed with the safety of marine life
close in mind and involved close observation of marine life in their normal settings (so that their normal behavior, without
the nearby use of low frequency active sonar, could be determined) and then while low frequency sound was being projected at them.
Marine experts were kept on hand during the experiments in order to make sure that, if the whales displayed any potentially harmful
variation from their normal behavior when the research was going on, sound projects would stop immediately.
The tests having recently been completed (in early April of 1998), the
Navy is now currently continuing in the preparation of its environmental
impact statement.
An interesting point to bring up here is that there is some dispute over what the actual results of this research were.
According to the Navy (see their web site), no serious detrimental effect on marine life was observed by the experts they had on
hand. Some other organizations (for example, the one that publishes this
web site) claim that harmful effects were observed by Hawaiian locals at the vacinity of the research site and that the Navy
dismissed these observationists as meaningless since they did not come from scientific sources.
One has to question, then, whether the Navy's scientists also actually made similar observationists (which were "hushed
up") or whether the locals which made the observations were indeed underqualified as scientists and made incorrect
observations.