Not only is the possibility of attack on land feasible, but so is that of
attacks on busy shipping lines. Such an attack could seriously disrupt
trading of resources between countries and could throw the economies of
several nations into chaos.
To stop the submarines, they have to be found, and the conventional method
of 'pinging' is not a very feasible option for a few reasons. First, the
oceans are huge, and the chances of locating an enemy submarine without
any knowledge of its whereabouts is extremely difficult. Second, if an
enemy submarine is found with short range pinging, ships have only a few
minutes to react before it is in danger of being sunk by the submarine.
The use of the LFAS system would neutralize this threat since it can scan
vast distances without the need of endangering human lives. Once the enemy
submarine was found, it would provide several precious hours to decide on
an attack plan. And while the ships would know the submarine's location,
it would not know where the ships sent out to hunt it were (since that
detection would require pinging which would reveal its position).
Why should such a system should be developed? With the capability of
launching ballistic and nuclear missiles, coupled with stealthy quietness,
today's submarines are a very potent force to be reckoned with. They can
sneak up along an enemy coastline and launch several missles and be gone
before the enemy knew what hit them. Several Third World countries are
acquiring their own nuclear submarines, and the threat of an attack on
American (or any other nation's) soil is very possible.